> I'd be curious about what Noel thinks as he was pretty grouchy about RFC
> compliance last week. This seems like a way to balance the needs of both.
Permissively accepting defective addresses in the mail envelope is different
from adding extra text to the message body.
I agree with Danny about the Microsoft problem. On the other hand, the
Internet content (RFC 2822) allows a wider range of host names than the SMTP
transport. I can see how it might be permissible in an Intranet
environment. If we allow more permissive names, I'd leave it off by
default, and have a more clarifying error message explaining the problem
than the current message about an invalid character.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
