I think that this probably my thinking Victor because although he has obviously done a lot of good using MMS, in some people the results could be bad, so as you say, I think personally that the risk outweighs the benefits for me. I did know of someone who, a few years ago, insulted me roundly when I voiced a word of caution about MMS, who later almost apologised to me, because he had an extremely bad reaction to it...dee
Sent from my iPad > On 1 Nov 2014, at 04:47, Victor Cozzetto <victor.cozze...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I just noticed that none of my posts about MMS are in the archive; which > would explain why nobody was responding to me. (Not sure what the issue is > Mike, but luckily I still have all the emails in my outbox). > > I am not a chemist, but here is my opinion that I have shared with others in > the past: > > I am sure that MMS works for many people, and I do not doubt that it could > potentially cure almost anything. However, I cannot recommend it or use it > with what I currently know. Of course I am still ignorant, but here are some > of the reasons why I would not use it: > > 1. MMS can be dangerous. It can do direct damage to the body, interact with > other chemicals, drugs, etc. It is too unpredictable, and thus the risk is > simply too high for me. > > 2. To my knowledge, MMS cannot do anything that colloidal silver (CS) cannot > do, but CS has zero risk, is cheaper, predictable, and is guaranteed to be > effective. (of course levels of effectiveness vary, depending on the ailment) > > 3. MMS can also be compared to ozonated water (because it uses oxidizing > effects), but again, the ozonated water has zero risk, is cheaper, more > predictable, and is guaranteed to be effective. > > 4. MMS has the same limitations that both CS and ozonated water have - in > that they cannot directly target lymph, nervous systems, etc. However, CS and > ozonated water contribute directly to strengthening the immune system, and > thus have a direct impact on all health. MMS can potentially achieve this > too, but that is not certain, since it can act as a toxin, and thus have the > opposite effect. > > 5. I might sound too harsh, but I would compare MMS more to chemo. It isn't > of course, but it is a chemical that can have a toxic effect on the body. It > can have a very rapid impact, but I am not sure how good that is, since it is > purely a 'killing' action, and does not enhance the body's ability to repair. > Both CS and Ozone provide direct 'killing' and greatly enhance the body's > ability to defend and repair. > > 6. I would be afraid to use MMS with other treatments, since is it s chemical > that I am not familiar enough with. Thus, I cannot add it to the things I am > doing. CS and Ozonated water work great with a variety of other treatments > and protocols. > > 7. Perhaps the greatest single problem - MMS is often cited as causing gut > problems for people, and that is not good, since the gut is the heart of our > immune system. By contrast, CS has no negative impact on the gut, and is used > to treat various gut ailments. (CS is absorbed very rapidly in the gut, and > normal consumption of kefir, yogurt, fermented foods, etc. ensure that CS has > no negative impact on gut flora). > > Again, I wouldn't doubt that MMS can save lives in places where no other > options are available, but putting that energy into getting CS (or other > treatments) is a much better long-term solution IMHO. > > Victor
