Hi, It's strange. Maybe you got CPU overload on the computer running sipp?
I don't see any other reasons for it. BR -- Tomasz Radziszewski Senior Software Engineer Ericpol Telecom sp. z o.o. Madalinskiego 9, 30-303 Krakow, Poland e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ericpol.com/ > Thank you Tomasz, > but I forgot in my last post to say that I've already set -l 0.I think it > should mean there's no limit to active calls, isn't it? Anyway I have made > two tests using different configuration files for my SER. In the first case > SER is slower than in the second and SIPp performances change. > > Starting SIPp with -r 10000 -l 0 parameters, I've noticed in the first test > an average rate of 4844 cps, in the second 7392 cps. How is it possible? > > Best Regards > Elisa > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! > Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, > along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness > and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 > _______________________________________________ > Sipp-users mailing list > Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
