On Thursday, November 10, 2005, 11:45:48 AM, Peer-to-Peer wrote: PtPS> _M,
PtPS> <<_M said>> will create a "default" installation that emits headers and puts PtPS> a .cf file in place for SA to interpret them. PtPS> Not sure if this is relevant to your thought process, but we feel that SA PtPS> (SpamAssassin) does more harm than good. Under moderate loads it bogs-down PtPS> MDaemon so we always have SA disabled. Sniffer is by far superior in every PtPS> category, (accuracy, speed, dependability etc...) so there's no need to use PtPS> SpamAssassin. PtPS> My point: Keep in mind that some of us use sniffer independently (not tied PtPS> to SA). We're using sniffers .cfg plug-in for MD ver 8. PtPS> I assume you will, and I probably misunderstood your post, but just wanted PtPS> to mention this out-loud. Thanks for this! I think it's the first time I've heard it said out loud from anyone involved with MDaemon. As a result I'm operating under the assumption that folks who install SNF on MDaemon _most likely_ have SA running and so that would be the simplest default installation. Is that true (do you think) or is it now more likely that SA would be disabled? In any case, the installer is intended for someone who just wants to push the button and have it work. In that context, what is the best "default install"? All that said, once the installation is complete, a technically savvy person could reconfigure SNF to and MDaemon to work in any way they prefer. We're definitely not going to do anything to make that more difficult. Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
