Both of which are reasonable, particularly given the recent
Blue Security debacle that showed that it was possible for the spammers as well
as the spammees to coordinate their information. It might be in a
spammer's best interest to pursue either of your
suggestions.
However, I still think it is more credible to assume that
this is a case of the spammer being simple-stupid instead of
uber-clever.
Andrew 8)
|
- [sniffer]Numeric spam Markus Gufler
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Heimir Eidskrem
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Goran Jovanovic
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Pete McNeil
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Steve Guluk
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Steve Guluk
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Colbeck, Andrew
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam John Carter
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam John T (Lists)
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Colbeck, Andrew
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Computer House Support
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Darin Cox
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Computer House Support
- Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam Darin Cox