Richard Stupek wrote:
Which of the 2 scan commands should we use to scan a message? Does sending the IP address help improve scanning?

<snf><xci><scanner><scan file='filepath'/></scanner></xci></snf>
OR
<snf><xci><scanner><scan file='filepath' xhdr='no' log='no' ip='12.34.56.78'/></scanner></xci></snf>
That depends on your needs.

If you want SNF + GBUdb to learn IPs by reading through the Received headers then you would NOT include the ip= attribute.

If you want to tell SNF + GBUdb what the source IP was for the message explicitly then you DO include the ip= attribute.

See:

http://www.armresearch.com/support/articles/software/snfServer/xci/scanner.jsp

"The ip='12.34.56.78' attribute is optional and indicates that the source IP for the message has already been determined as 12.34.56.78. If this option is used then GBUdb training directives may not function as expected. This option is best used when the calling application has already determined the correct source IP for the message and wishes to force the source IP value rather than have SNF+GBUdb discover it from Received headers in the message.

Note: It is often best to let SNF + GBUdb determine the source IP for a given message based on the Received headers. If the connecting IP is not already represented in the top Received header for the message then the calling application should create one in the top of the temporary file SNF is going to scan."

Hope this helps,

_M


#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <sniffer-...@sortmonster.com>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com>
Send administrative queries to  <sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com>

Reply via email to