On 24 March 2013 18:07, Alex Ott <[email protected]> wrote: > > I also don't see much benefits of Google Test vs. Boost.Test. The one > benefit of Google Test is that it's working with Google C++ Mocking > framework. But for Boost.Test there is turtle library with almost same > functionality
For me, that kind of combination is an important element, as I explained briefly in comment [1] to your article. I see advantages of using libraries from common sources/authors/projects versus mixing and matching different ones. [1] http://alexott.net/en/cpp/CppTestingIntro.html#comment-853141322 Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html _______________________________________________ soci-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
