On 7 April 2013 04:52, Mateusz Loskot <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why I mention mock every time? > I'd really like to add set of proper unit tests, along with integration tests > based on rewriting current tests. I'm also hoping to use this as > opportunity to master testing+mocking techniques myself. > So, I assume use of testing and mocking tools.
While re-reading the Boost.Test thread, I stumbled upon this very curious post by Gennadiy [1]. It turns out Boost.Test has got some mocking facilities [2]. I will look into details and see what's the status, but if it's basically usable, then Boost.Test makes a strong option for me. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/234297/focus=234621 [2] http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/libs/test/example/logged_exp_example.cpp Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html _______________________________________________ soci-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
