On 10/9/06, Michael Jerris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I this case, it appears to be exactly that, the cisco implementation
> very clearly states in a debug message that it doesn't know what to do
> when it gets the 200 ok w/o sdp, and immediately sends a bye. Can we
> add a tag to force sending sdp in that packet that can be passed
> through, also, can you toss me an rfc reference about how we are not
> supposed to send in the 200 ok after the 183 so we can file the bug with
> cisco.
OK: So there is a new tag NUTAG_INCLUDE_EXTRA_SDP() in darcs that you
can use with nua_respond(). The offer/answer stuff needs some double
checking...
if you want to file a bug report with Cisco, then there is this document:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sip/draft-sawada-sipping-sip-offeranswer-01.txt
Paul Kyzivat is working for Cisco.
--
Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Sofia-sip-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
