autodesk devs are mostly all at 1280x1024 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Matt Lind <ml...@carbinestudios.com> wrote:
> From 1993 thru 2005 when I worked on 21 inch CRT monitors, I worked in > 1280 x 1024 resolution and had no problems doing work.**** > > ** ** > > The issue is whether the image on the screen is large enough to see what > you’re doing. Higher resolution is definitely nicer, but if the monitor is > not physically large then the higher resolution works against you.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Matt**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto: > softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *pete...@skynet.be > *Sent:* Friday, September 28, 2012 12:19 PM > > *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > *Subject:* Re: Softimage CIP Data - Screen Resolution**** > > ** ** > > 1600x1200 is still perfectly acceptable – **** > > **** > > but say 1280x1024? – there’s hardly any room for the viewport left at that > res – I’d feel claustrophobic.**** > > **** > > *From:* Matt Lind <ml...@carbinestudios.com> **** > > *Sent:* Friday, September 28, 2012 7:44 PM**** > > *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com **** > > *Subject:* RE: Softimage CIP Data - Screen Resolution**** > > **** > > Most of our computer monitors run at 1600 x 1200 resolution.**** > > **** > > Games companies typically use cheaper hardware and lower resolution than > in film/post production as games studios are notoriously cheap on hardware > for DCC app use.**** > > **** > > **** > > Matt**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [ > mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>] > *On Behalf Of *pete...@skynet.be > *Sent:* Friday, September 28, 2012 12:05 AM > *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > *Subject:* Re: Softimage CIP Data - Screen Resolution**** > > **** > > Yeah – I’m surprised about the majority being less than 1500 by 1000.**** > > **** > > I thought of 24” at 1920x1200 as the de facto standard.**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* Len Krenzler <l...@creativecontrol.ca> **** > > *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:02 PM**** > > *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com **** > > *Subject:* Re: Softimage CIP Data - Screen Resolution**** > > **** > > What amazes me also is that there seems to be some at less than 1000 and > quite a few at around 1000. Would there even be any viewport left at that > point? I'll have to try it for fun. Why would anyone use a multi thousand > dollar software package on a $10 monitor...hmmm... > > On 9/27/2012 2:37 PM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau wrote:**** > > Ya and that’s called bragging Votch. ;)**** > > We’re mostly on 24” here.**** > > **** > > *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [ > mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>] > *On Behalf Of *Votch > *Sent:* 27 septembre 2012 16:28 > *To:* softimage > *Subject:* Softimage CIP Data - Screen Resolution**** > > **** > > I was poking around in the CIP data preview and noticed an interesting > stat. Everybody at Whiskytree has an Apple 30" Cinema Display. Is it > possible we represent the .11% of Softimage users :) > > [image: Inline image 1] > > **** > > > > **** > > -- **** > > _________________________________________________**** > > **** > > Len Krenzler - Creative Control Media Productions**** > > **** > > Phone: 780.463.3126**** > > **** > > www.creativecontrol.ca - l...@creativecontrol.ca**** > >
