Hi Oleg. I am using the Iterative mode.
2013/2/26 Emilio Hernandez <emi...@e-roja.com> > Mmm. That is a good point. I will give the knife some thickness to > shatter the object to avoid the interpenetration if there is some. > > > 2013/2/26 Stefan Kubicek <s...@tidbit-images.com> > >> I suspect the pieces from the shattered object are either >> interpenetrating right from start or have a collision offset greater than >> zero. Or you have found a bug. >> >> >> One thing I found is that I shattered a cube with Implosia and then >>> applied >>> a Momentum DRB. When I start simulating it kind of explodes instead of >>> just coming down. If I shatter the same cube with the ICE shatter >>> compound >>> and then I apply the MOM DRB it behaves different and it comes down as it >>> should. This is odd... >>> >>> >>> 2013/2/26 Stefan Kubicek <s...@tidbit-images.com> >>> >>> Hey Rob, >>>> >>>> thanks for the heads up. The change list includes lots of issues I >>>> reported some months ago, >>>> I'm glad to see version 4 is taking shape since 3 did have some >>>> unnecessary limitations >>>> and oddities which are being addressed now as it seems. It's such a cool >>>> piece of software >>>> with so much potential.... >>>> >>>> There seems to be a new version coming: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.si-community.com/****community/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=****3427<http://www.si-community.com/**community/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=**3427> >>>>> <http://www.si-**community.com/community/**viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3427<http://www.si-community.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3427> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rob >>>>> >>>>> \/-------------\/-------------****---\/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 26-2-2013 7:40, Leonard Koch wrote: >>>>> >>>>> From my experience of working with Momentum/Implosia on a few jobs and >>>>>> watching some of the videos by MirVadim I would say, that RayFire is >>>>>> better and a lot more intuitive for complex shattering. >>>>>> The actual simulation speed and directability of the shattered pieces >>>>>> however is many times better in Momentum. >>>>>> For actual production I would be a lot more confident to make a >>>>>> simulation look the way it is supposed to with Momentum. >>>>>> >>>>>> Shattering, dynamic UVs and mainly caching are all still a bite iffy >>>>>> with exocortex's solution, but the directability is unbeaten. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Emilio Hernandez <emi...@e-roja.com >>>>>> <mailto:emi...@e-roja.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> How far is Implosia with Momentum to achieve something like this? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?****feature=player_embedded&v=**<http://www.youtube.com/watch?**feature=player_embedded&v=**> >>>>>> mn3ifA1gcD8#<http://www.**youtube.com/watch?feature=** >>>>>> player_embedded&v=mn3ifA1gcD8#<http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mn3ifA1gcD8#> >>>>>> **> >>>>>> >>>>>> ! >>>>>> >>>>>> I need to break a wall earthquake style with ceiling coming down, >>>>>> small fragments, etc., and wondering if I can beat this Ray Fire >>>>>> stuff with Implosia and Momentum. Need to win this gig. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thx. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> No virus found in this message. >>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2641/6133 - Release Date: >>>>>> 02/25/13 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> ------------------------------****------------- >>>> Stefan Kubicek Co-founder >>>> ------------------------------****------------- >>>> >>>> keyvis digital imagery >>>> Wehrgasse 9 - Grüner Hof >>>> 1050 Vienna Austria >>>> Phone: +43/699/12614231 >>>> --- www.keyvis.at ste...@keyvis.at --- >>>> -- This email and its attachments are >>>> --confidential and for the recipient only-- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------**------------- >> Stefan Kubicek Co-founder >> ------------------------------**------------- >> keyvis digital imagery >> Wehrgasse 9 - Grüner Hof >> 1050 Vienna Austria >> Phone: +43/699/12614231 >> --- www.keyvis.at ste...@keyvis.at --- >> -- This email and its attachments are >> --confidential and for the recipient only-- >> >> > > > -- > > --
