I think (re)using solrj is a good idea. As a client, I'd rather have one API to use for both distributed and non-distributed calls to Solr.
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:13:43 AM Subject: solrj for distributed search I've been hacking on SOLR-303 (distributed search), and I started to write my own XML parsing code utilizing stax (streaming), when I realized that the code had already been written (in SolrJ). Should we use SolrJ for making and parsing the distributed search requests? One downside is that SolrJ would need to be moved into the core, but I was planning on migrating to HttpClient at some point anyway. Thoughts? -Yonik
