Thoughts?
I like this idea. The more we reuse stuff, the better it should get.
If/when we figure a faster way to transmit request/response data (JSON?
RMI?), it would be good to have this cooked into distributed search easily.
> One downside is that SolrJ would need to be moved into the core, but I
hymmm. true. It would make core depend on a specific client. Clients
would still not need to include jar files for 'core' stuff. It would
have a dependancile graph like:
+ common
+ solrj
+ core
I guess common and solrj could be a single jar, but it may be useful to
keep them separated.
ryan
