Is there a way to have the max_side field only in Solr ...as in a conditional 
copyField or something like that?

I'd like to push as much of this into Solr as I can because the app and db that 
Solr is indexing are not really the best place to add this type of 
functionality.









----- Original Message ----
From: Koji Sekiguchi <k...@r.email.ne.jp>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 4:04:29 AM
Subject: Re: Solr Query help - sorting

Hi Erik Earle,

Ahh, I read your mail too fast... Erik Hatcher's method should work.

Thanks!

Koji


Erik Hatcher wrote:
> You couldn't sort on a multiValued field though.
>
> I'd simply index a max_side field, and have the indexing client add a 
> single valued field with max(length,width) to it.  Then sort on max_side.
>
>     Erik
>
> On Aug 25, 2009, at 4:00 AM, Constantijn Visinescu wrote:
>
>> make a new multivalued field in your schema.xml, copy both width and 
>> length
>> into that field, and then sort on that field ?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:40 AM, erikea...@yahoo.com 
>> <erikea...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Clever... but if more than one row adds up to the same value I may 
>>> get the
>>> wrong order (like 50, 50 and 10, 90)
>>>
>>> I need a max function but the one provided only compares against a
>>> constant.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Koji Sekiguchi <k...@r.email.ne.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>> How about using sum() FunctionQuery, via:
>>>
>>> http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=_val_%3A%22sum%28width%2Clength%29%22 
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Koji
>>>
>>>
>>> Erik Earle wrote:
>>> Suppose I have a database of rectangle attributes that I have 
>>> indexed in
>>> Solr and I want to get the top 10 widest or longest rectangles from one
>>> query.
>>>
>>>
>>> name  |  width  |  length
>>> A     |  100    |  10
>>> B     |  10     |  90
>>> C     |  80     |  10
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> My indexed fields are:  name, width, length
>>>
>>> Is there a way to query so that my data returns the order:  A, B, C
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>


      

Reply via email to