I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4863


On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a bug. The sourceId should have been removed from the
> SolrDynamicMBean. I'll create an issue.
>
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:39 PM, 菅沼 嘉一 <yo_sugan...@waku-2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> Our team faced the problem regarding the sourceId of JMX when getting the
>> information of JMX from tomcat manager.
>>
>> Command:
>> curl http://localhost:
>> ${PORT}/manager/jmxproxy?qry=solr:type=documentCache,*
>>
>> Here is the error log (tomcat/manager log).
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 2013/05/27 0:04:01 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log
>> JMXProxy: Error getting attribute
>> solr:type=documentCache,id=org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache sourceId
>> javax.management.AttributeNotFoundException: sourceId
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Solr ver. : 4.1.0
>>
>> I think this error comes from when JMX cannot get the sourceId.
>>
>>
>> BTW Let's look at this issue.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3329
>>
>> It is decided to drop getSourceId() in this issue.
>>
>> But in org.apache.solr.core.JmxMonitoredMap.SolrDynamicMBean,
>> staticStats.add("sourceId") is still defined in SolrDynamicMBean at L211.
>>
>>
>> http://javasourcecode.org/html/open-source/solr/solr-3.3.0/org/apache/solr/core/JmxMonitoredMap.SolrDynamicMBean.java.html#line.202
>> --------------------------------------
>> l.211      staticStats.add("sourceId");
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> Maybe this error comes from this inconsistency.
>> This problem is not critical, but I think this is inconsistent.
>>
>> 1. Anyone knows why staticStats.add("sourceId") still remained in
>> SolrDynamicMBean?
>> Do you have any idea?
>>
>> 2. Has anyone faced such error ? How did you solved it?
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Regards
>> suganuma
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>



-- 
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.

Reply via email to