That's almost exactly what I did - the only other thing I did was change the 
return_value if the result were true:

//return_value = FILTER_DECISION_DO_FILTER;
return_value = FILTER_FLAG_INTERCEPT;

Tested and working great!

-Marc


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "spamdyke users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Black/whitelists first?


> Ah, yes, you're right.  Busy day + no testing == mistake.  Always. :)
>
> The moved code should not be in a final "else" block, it should actually
> be in its own "if" statement that looks like this:
> if ((current_settings->rejection == NULL) &&
> (current_settings->transient_rejection == NULL))
>
> Again, I haven't tested this. :)
>
> -- Sam Clippinger
>
> Marc Van Houwelingen wrote:
>> I have confirmed the moved RBL code is never getting executed. By placing 
>> it
>> in an "else" at the end of the "if" beginning on 1165, it never gets run.
>> This is because the elseif before it will always get run when a blacklist
>> file is set:
>>
>> else if (current_settings->blacklist_recipient_file != NULL)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Marc Van Houwelingen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "spamdyke users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
>> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 6:35 AM
>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Black/whitelists first?
>>
>>
>>> I may have spoken too soon. It appears now that nothing is being 
>>> rejected
>>> for RBL reasons. I'll see if I can't dig deeper to find the reason.
>>>
>>> -Marc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Marc Van Houwelingen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "spamdyke users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 8:31 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Black/whitelists first?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Works perfectly. Thanks very much!
>>>>
>>>> -Marc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: "spamdyke users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 5:37 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Black/whitelists first?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You really just need to move the DNS RBL/RHSBL tests from their 
>>>>> current
>>>>> location (just after the initial connection) to after the recipient
>>>>> blacklist test.
>>>>>
>>>>> In version 3.1.7, all of the changes should be made in spamdyke.c. 
>>>>> The
>>>>> DNS RBL and RHSBL tests are in two blocks, between lines 2817 and 
>>>>> 2838,
>>>>> in run_tests() (marked with comments saying "Check DNS RBL" and "Check
>>>>> RHSBL").  You'll want to move those lines to smtp_filter(), above the
>>>>> graylist tests that start on line 1212.  They'll need to be contained
>>>>> inside an "else" block at the end of the "if/elseif/elseif" sequence
>>>>> that starts on line 1165.
>>>>>
>>>>> Be sure to change the final "elseif" (the recipient blacklist test) to
>>>>> surround the "for" loop in a "{}" block.  Otherwise your new "else" 
>>>>> will
>>>>> be interpreted inside the loop instead of becoming part of the
>>>>> "if/elseif/elseif" sequence.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope that makes sense.  I could probably whip out a patch against 
>>>>> the
>>>>> unmodified version 3.1.7 if that would be better.
>>>>>
>>>>> DISCLAIMER: Be sure to test thoroughly!  I'm only looking at the code 
>>>>> as
>>>>> I type this; I haven't even tried to compile these changes or test 
>>>>> them
>>>>> in any way.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>>>>
>>>>> Marc Van Houwelingen wrote:
>>>>>> Sounds like the new version will help me out quite a bit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For now, maybe I could just insert a redundant black/whitelist check
>>>>>> above
>>>>>> the RBL code? I already have a small mod of my own in there for
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> wildcard related.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps you could just point me to the line number where I could 
>>>>>> insert
>>>>>> code
>>>>>> such that it would be read just before the RBL code? I'm happy to 
>>>>>> play
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> this myself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Marc
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>> From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> To: "spamdyke users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:57 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Black/whitelists first?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the current version, you'd have to edit the source and it's not a
>>>>>>> small change.  In the upcoming version, I've already reordered the
>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>> this way.  Changing the order will still require editing the source
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> the changes will be much smaller (I've refactored the filter code
>>>>>>> quite
>>>>>>> a bit).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> spamdyke checks DNS RBLs first because it tries to find a way to
>>>>>>> reject
>>>>>>> the incoming connection as quickly as possible.  For example, if the
>>>>>>> connection matches a DNS RBL and you're not using sender/recipient
>>>>>>> whitelist files or SMTP AUTH, spamdyke will not start qmail at 
>>>>>>> all --
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> will imitate an SMTP server long enough to reject the connection.
>>>>>>> When
>>>>>>> I wrote that code, I judged it was more important to close qmail 
>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> prevent DNS queries.  Because so many spamdyke installations are 
>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>> sender/recipient whitelists and SMTP AUTH, this logic has become
>>>>>>> outdated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Marc Van Houwelingen wrote:
>>>>>>>> I have a domain that is constantly bombarded with incoming spam. 
>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>> spam comes in by the thousands, all to random names @mydomain.com.
>>>>>>>> Spamdyke is successfully blocking all of them using
>>>>>>>> recipient-blacklist-file to block the domain and
>>>>>>>> recipient-whitelist-file to allow the 10 or 15 actual legit
>>>>>>>> exceptions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This works great - but the problem is Spamdyke usually rejects most
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> this incoming junk for other reasons (RDNS, RBL, etc) before even
>>>>>>>> checking the blacklist file. The net result is the same of course,
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> my mail server ends up having done a bunch of extra DNS/RBL lookup
>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>> when it could have rejected the email simply based on the 
>>>>>>>> recipient.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My question is: Is there a way to make Spamdyke check the
>>>>>>>> recipient-[black|white]list-files before doing the other
>>>>>>>> resource-costly
>>>>>>>> lookups?
>>>>>>>> -Marc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>>>>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>>>>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>>>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>>>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to