Ron eliminated softlimit entirely, and still has the error. Thanks for the suggestion though. -- -Eric 'shubes'
On 06/10/2011 05:11 AM, BC wrote: > > There is something else amiss here, from my reading of the logs. If > there is gobs of memory available, then do as Sam suggests and > allocate a LOT - say 300mb to the softlimit and retest. I'd wager > there will still be troubles. > > On 6/9/2011 11:54 AM, spamdyke-users-requ...@spamdyke.org wrote: >> So instead of hitting the spamdyke timeout, it hit a timeout on the i/o >> operation. Still doesn't point to the root cause. :( >> Why softlimit doesn't issue some sort of error message is beyond me. I'm >> still inclined to ditch it. _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
