I'll answer for Ron, as he's using QMT, which I'm familiar with. On 06/10/2011 10:13 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > It depends, is Qmail using a different cert than Spamdyke is?
No. (per config file) > When you say you're doing TLS directly in Qmail, I'm assuming that > you're using a Qmail that has the Qmail-TLS patch applied? > http://inoa.net/qmail-tls/ That is correct. > Qmail-TLS appears to use $QMAILDIR/control/servercert.pem and uses 512- > and 1024-bit DH param files, as well. I can see that Ron's Spamdyke > configuration is pointing at the same certificate, but doesn't support a > separate DH param PEM as far as I can see. You mean spamdyke doesn't support a separate DH param PEM? > This last bit (the DH params) is the only major difference I can see > between Qmail-TLS and Spamdyke. Going to test a few things ... ;) Great, thanks. -- -Eric 'shubes' _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
