OK - this sounds very good. If you can think of any more or more specifics just let me know.
On May 4, 2011, at 3:41 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:32:12PM -0500, Cliff Sharp wrote: >> So, now I use the X11 environment that comes with osx when I actually run >> spiced and/or spicy. But I feel you are correct in saying that it is >> better to use the X11 system that comes with osx. >> >> I was just attempting to notify others of these issues in hopes that it >> might help them to save some time. > > Ah ok, thanks for that, I thought you wanted to fix things on the macports > X side :) Since spice-gtk-x11 on osx isn't that interesting to me (I'd > rather have a more native port using gtk-osx), if it works with Apple X11, > I'd leave it at that :) > >> Do you feel it is worth the time to build an Xcode project for building >> spicec and spice-gtk to distribute? The visual debugger is sure nice in >> Xcode. > > I wouldn't spend too much time on an Xcode project for spicec. It might be > useful for spice-gtk, but it might be too early for that. In my opinion, > what would be really nice is > * a working spice-gtk using gtk-osx (spice-gtk currently has X11/windows > specific bits that needs to be ported) > * when we have that, having some kind of bundle that people can install to > use in xcode would be great (I think the gtk-osx project has some tools > to help in doing that) > * longer term, a cocoa spice client (probably using spice-client-glib for > the low-level spice stuff) would be even better (I assume this would ease > iOS porting) > > Christophe ____ Cliff Sharp | csh...@vbridges.com
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel