Ok, just checking. The database I was referring to was an Historian Collector so the amount of data that it needed to maintain was time limited so it was more or less a FIFO by tag.
--- The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. >-----Original Message----- >From: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users- >boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Dinu >Sent: Sunday, 17 December, 2017 15:58 >To: sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org >Subject: Re: [sqlite] Atomic DELETE index optimisation? > >Keith Medcalf wrote >> I had a similar problem with a multi-terabyte database once upon a >time. > >Na, they are not a single-time use rows, otherwise I'd have used a >FIFO :) >Every now and then, a large portion of the table becomes obsolete by >external factors. > > > >-- >Sent from: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/ >_______________________________________________ >sqlite-users mailing list >sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org >http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
