No answer yet: * Duane Wessels * Robert Collins
I have mixed feelings about 2.6. On one hand I think "2.5" has lived too long and it looks bad that we have not incremented the stable branch number for years. But on the other hand I feel cheated because I remember being scolded for adding things to the squid-2-head branch when others had decided that it would become a dead end. Like you I suppose, I have a number of little 2.5 features and fixes that I use on my own squids, which I have been reluctant to commit for those reasons. My company has taken on development projects with the understanding that all future work will go into squid-3. As part of that work we have promised spend time on making squid-3 stable. We still intend to do that. Looking at the current wishlist for 2.6 I think it is too long and too ambitious. I would rather that people spend time on squid-3, but that is perhaps a selfish reason. Duane W.
