* Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > diskd also isn't very cpu hungry. In fact probably a bit less than aufs. > But diskd can not push the drives as far as aufs, and is still plauged > some instability issues..
So you say aufs is defacto FASTER than diskd? -- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-962 IT-Zentrum Standort CBF send no mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
