Richard Tew ha scritto:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Nicolas Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am I right in assuming that, if I never use preemptive scheduling, I
>> never need to use "...set_atomic(True)...",
>> to guarantee the atomicity of the middle block ?
>
> Yes.
>
By the way, will stackless provide context manager for atomicity to be
used in the "with" statement? I mean, wouldn't it be good to be able to
write:
with stackless.atomic():
your_code_here()
instead of:
t = stackless.getcurrent()
flag = t.set_atomic(True)
try:
your_code_here()
finally:
t.set_atomic(flag)
I know it's not difficult for a user to write such a context manager,
but it would be nice to have it provided by stackless itself.
Same thing, possibly, for set_ignore_nesting().
Just my 2 eurocent,
Ganesh
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
