Hi Jeff. Jeff Senn wrote:
Hm. Do you mean "thread" or "process"? Because of the GIL you cannot use threads to overlap python execution within one interpreter (this has been discussed at great length here many times...) -- depending on how you are measuring, perhaps you would aspire to get 200%, 400% ...etc for multicore....
I mean thread, not process. And what I meant with 100% utilization was 200% for the 2-core Mac I tested on... At least that was what I thought I saw - I'll have to test that again some time :-)
Best regards Mads _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
