*sigh* I'm really hoping that the world hasn't gotten to the point where we feel that software needs to be updated frequently to be "trustworthy" or "useful".
[I think I will (almost) avoid a serious bout of contentiousness by skipping a statement here about the relative merits of astractly-beautiful-but-backward-incompatible changes of Python 3.x compared to incorporating pragmatically useful features like stackless into the base language... ] On Feb 1, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Richard Tew wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Denis Bilenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is there a chance of having a greenlet interface implemented in Stackless >> Lite? >> greenlet extension that we have now has not been maintained for a >> while and there >> are libraries that depend on it. > > This sounds a bit strange to me. What maintenance are greenlets not > getting? The advantage they have over Stackless, is that they are an > extension that does not need to be maintained. The only work they > require is additional assembler files for additional platforms. > > Besides changing the implementation I am not sure what this would give > Greenlets that they do not already have. > > Richard. > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
