On 2/1/10 10:13 PM, Richard Tew wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Denis Bilenko<[email protected]> wrote:
Is there a chance of having a greenlet interface implemented in Stackless Lite?
greenlet extension that we have now has not been maintained for a
while and there
are libraries that depend on it.
This sounds a bit strange to me. What maintenance are greenlets not
getting? The advantage they have over Stackless, is that they are an
extension that does not need to be maintained. The only work they
require is additional assembler files for additional platforms.
Besides changing the implementation I am not sure what this would give
Greenlets that they do not already have.
If I am successful with the Stackless Lite approach, then a greenlet module
could be faster, and support pickling...
ciao -- chris
--
Christian Tismer :^)<mailto:[email protected]>
tismerysoft GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9A : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 30 80 90 57 05
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
