-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:32, Jonas Smedegaard<d...@jones.dk> wrote: >> As subject says, newest Journal release available at >> http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/sources/Journal/ (and not at >> sugarlabs.org!), released january 2009, is not reflected as a Git tag >> at git://git.sugarlabs.org/journal/mainline (neither at the git at >> dev.laptop.org). > >Actually, the tag was in dev.laptop.org but not in git.sugarlabs.org, >I have updated gitorious. > >http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/journal/repos/mainline/commits/c70633c93154b8438321e253ed3b21f9c48dc7aa > >Please note that the journal is not an independent module since 0.84, >so only if you are packaging 0.82 you should worry about it (and go to >OLPC machines for tarballs etc.).
Ah, that explains why such a core part is not "up-to-date". Perhaps you should add an end-of-life note, detailing whether it is harmless or not to have the old activity installed on newer Sugar, at these places: http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/journal/repos/mainline http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Journal http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Application_Stack (and possibly more - I keep loosing track of all the "homepages" of Sugar pieces) ...or for the places that is inappropriate to display historical info, it might make sense to _remove_ mentioning Journal instead. Kind regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAkoo8d0ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjdPACfbFPYfn+o0VZW9zST2+9+VStA Ib0AmwWfqcKZm8GFvZt2Wy7Ty3uZbGua =LrzJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel