-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:25:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:22, Jonas Smedegaard<d...@jones.dk> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>Please note that the journal is not an independent module since 0.84, >>>so only if you are packaging 0.82 you should worry about it (and go >>>to OLPC machines for tarballs etc.). >> >> Ah, that explains why such a core part is not "up-to-date". >> >> Perhaps you should add an end-of-life note, detailing whether it is >> harmless or not to have the old activity installed on newer Sugar, at >> these places: >> >> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/journal/repos/mainline > >It's already in http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/journal
Ah, ok. >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Journal >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Application_Stack >> >> (and possibly more - I keep loosing track of all the "homepages" of >> Sugar pieces) >> >> ...or for the places that is inappropriate to display historical >> info, it might make sense to _remove_ mentioning Journal instead. > >Well the journal exist, it's just that it's incorporated in the shell >module instead of living in its own module. I guess this is only of >concern to packagers, not to regular users? Yeah, I guess you are right. I just felt that more places than Gitorious targeted packagers, but maybe not. At least I got the message now. :-D - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAkopC4QACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiIagCdGlH3WWvzrxY1tZFCvm/jKQqD rnoAnju+UkYBjJsJoL80xRN+Z6FZ+KQg =TT+e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel