[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > * Firefox 2 and 3 are only slightly sugarized. > > GS - True. It is what it is and no plans to make big changes here AFAIK. > > greg -- i think you answered your own question. the issues > raised in that linked email are a result of firefox not being > fully sugarized. it might be possible to improve their behavior, > but this falls squarely under the big "make traditional X11 apps > work better under sugar" umbrella.
We already have a Sugarized version of Firefox: Browse. But people complained the interface didn't look and behave like Firefox. So now we provide a Firefox activity, but people complain it's not sugarized enough!!! We can't win this game ;-) -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
