On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > > * Firefox 2 and 3 are only slightly sugarized. >> > GS - True. It is what it is and no plans to make big changes here AFAIK. >> >> greg -- i think you answered your own question. the issues >> raised in that linked email are a result of firefox not being >> fully sugarized. it might be possible to improve their behavior, >> but this falls squarely under the big "make traditional X11 apps >> work better under sugar" umbrella. > > We already have a Sugarized version of Firefox: Browse. But people > complained the interface didn't look and behave like Firefox. > So now we provide a Firefox activity, but people complain it's not > sugarized enough!!! > > We can't win this game ;-)
But you can bet it's fun to watch ;) Tomeu _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar