2008/12/2 Luke Faraone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Oh, I accidentally moved this off-list, shall I forward this back? Oops. By all means, its interesting.
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 19:56, Sebastian Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> (...) >> user=laptop. >> > >> > It's not exactly; because in that model the laptop doesn't even make >> > sure >> > that anyone with a pulse was physically present at the XO, let alone >> > that it >> > was its "owner". >> So then, the XO identity provider must answer this question (how? >> user/pass? biometrics? perhaps a mere captcha (yuk) ?) > Well, since the XO is acting as the "hardware authentication token", a > simple "You are logging into FooBarLabs.Com, right?" dialog would suffice. > If we're really smart, browse will be able to notify the authentication > daemon that the user just tried to login to FooBarLabs and bypass the > prompt, which GUI designers agree are evil. Yay, I think we agree. A simple confirmation dialog, and if browse can let the auth daemon (or its other name: local identity provider :-P ) know that it just tried to login... Sounds all pretty sensible. -- Sebastian Silva Iniciativa FuenteLibre http://blog.sebastiansilva.com/ _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar