Assuming you are not trolling....

I'm not buying a thin client because the hardware costs less, but for a whole lot of other reasons, not limited to, but including:

 * no data on device
 * no need to synchonise laptops, desktops, etc.
 * no need to carry a laptop with me to the office at all

These are just my personal reason, I'm sure if I spent more than 10secs, I'd come up with a whole lot more....

Eric


On 20/10/2013 13:26, lars.tunkr...@bredband.net wrote:

  Well,  How many SUN-Ray 3  were shipped   during the last 12 months ?
  I would not think It was wast amount.

  Today  a new laptop  is cheaper than  a thin-client.
  The purchaser's reason to buy thin clients  have vanished.
    //Lars

On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:33:24 -0700, Kent Peacock <jken...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 10/17/2013 8:57 PM, Aaron Browne wrote:
Is anyone able to point me in the direction of a real explanation as
to why Oracle is choosing to discontinue their Sun Ray products?
$$$

(My own opinion, not Oracle's, etc, etc.)

Kent
Senior Software Developer from (almost) the beginning in 1998.

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users


--
____
     /          .                           Eric A. Bautsch
    /--   __       ___                ______________________________________
   /     /    /   /                  /
  (_____/____(___(__________________/       email: eric.baut...@pobox.com

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to