I look forward to this


--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "steve spence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> biodiesel in the main tank, wvo in the secondary tank. life is 
beautiful.
> stay tuned for an article on Greg Yohn's new '98 VW Jetta SVO/WVO
> conversion.
> 
> 
> Steve Spence
> Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter:
> http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm
> 
> Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.dns2go.com/
> Human powered devices, equipment, and transport -
> http://www.webconx.dns2go.com/2000/humanpower.htm
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [biofuel] SVO versus BD
> 
> 
> > Thanks for the useful information and the links
> >
> > Reinhard
> >
> > "Darren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > > I strongly agree with Keith.  SVO vs biodiesel?  Neither should 
be
> > > dismissed each has it's place.  Is very dependant on the 
individual
> > > situation:-
> > > What engine?
> > > Resources available for processing oils or converting vehicles.
> > > Vehicle use patterns.
> > > Vehicle operator/owners preference
> > > etc. etc.
> > > Clearly biodiesel has the greatest short term opportunities 
especially
> for
> > > transportation fuels.
> > > There has been many reports of successful SVO systems and 
trouble free
> use.
> > > There have also been problems reported but this is not 
exclusive to SVO
> > > use - biodiesel users especially home brewers encounter 
problems also.
> > > The main difference as I see it is that biodiesel fuel has been
> extensively
> > > researched world wide in many different engines and made from 
many
> different
> > > oil feedstock's.  SVO especially WVO use remains a bit of a 
grey area as
> far
> > > as hard scientific research goes.  I have seen many studies 
looking at
> > > vegetable oils suitability.  Most conclude SVO is to thick and 
brush it
> > > aside as unsuitable and instead study biodiesel.  There are a 
few good
> > > studies of SVO out there on the web: (not many that cover pre 
heating
> the
> > > oil)
> > >
> > > -The much touted ACREVO project report - very good detailed 
research.
> > >
> > > http://www.nf-2000.org/secure/Fair/F484.htm
> > >
> > > -Available on the web but I don't have the link handy..... 
should be
> able to
> > > find it with a search engine (good news for IDI's running in 
Africa!!!!)
> > >
> > > FACT-Vol. 12. Solid Fuel Conversion
> > > for the Transportation Sector
> > > ASME 1991
> > > TECHNICAL OVERVIEW OF VEGETABLE OIL
> > > AS A TRANSPORTATION FUEL
> > > Charles L. Peterson and Dick L. Auld
> > > Department of Agricultural Engineering
> > > University of Idaho
> > > Moscow, Idaho
> > >
> > > -Biocar site has a thesis research project into the use of 
their kit to
> run
> > > SVO.
> > > In German http://www.biocar.de/
> > > Part English translation http://www.vegburner.co.uk/biocar.html 
(thank
> you
> > > Stephan)
> > >
> > > -Ed Beggs has his "Renewable Oil Fuels..." thesis available on 
his site
> > > http://www.biofuels.ca
> > >
> > > -Another one that I haven't got the link handy....
> > > Waste Vegetable Oil As A Diesel Replacement Fuel
> > > Phillip Calais* and AR (Tony) Clark**
> > > * Environmental Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia,
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ** Western Australian Renewable Fuels Association Inc,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Plenty more that go into blending vegetable oil with solvents, 
diesel,
> > > petrol etc.  More information on SVO and WVO use is required.  
Does
> anyone
> > > know of any other scientific reports of SVO use or any studies 
in
> progress?
> > >
> > > There is the very useful FMSO Database of SVO vehicles in 
German.  A
> great
> > > resource worth a look even if you can't read German 
http://www.fmso.de/
> > > click on the "Mehr als 300 Autos in der: Fahrzeugdatenbank!" 
link
> > >
> > > Darren Hill
> > > www.vegburner.co.uk
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 09 July 2002 18:33
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [biofuel] SVO versus BD
> > >
> > >
> > > Reinhard Henning wrote:
> > >
> > > >Albert Einstein often said: "Use the simplest thing that 
works, as
> > > >long as it's the best thing."
> > >
> > > The proviso is critical, and in many cases it's context-
sensitive - I
> > > believe this is the case with the biodiesel vs SVO argument. In 
the
> > > end it boils down to a matter of particular circumstances and
> > > individual preferences.
> > >
> > > >This in mind one should compare the two actual possibilities 
to use
> > > >plant oil as fuel:
> > > >
> > > >1) adaptation of the oil to the engine (bio-diesel, BD)
> > > >2) modification of the engine to run on pure plant oil 
(straight
> > > >vegetable oil, svo)
> > > >
> > > >Plant oil is pure stored solar energy in its densiest form 
(9,2 kg
> > > >/l). It contains only the elements carbon C, hydrogen H and 
oxygen
> > > >O. In the simplest way it is produced only by grinding of 
seeds and
> > > >pressing (ram presses, expellers) it. Purification by 
sedimentation
> > > >and / or filtration: Can somebody imagine a simpler method of
> > > >producing highly concentrated, environmentally friendly energy.
> > > >
> > > >In a short term planning, it is interesting to use biodiesel,
> > > >because you can use the already existing car engines.
> > > >
> > > >But in a longer perspective, it is more interesting to adapt 
the
> > > >engines to run on pure plant oil (SVO). And you have all the
> > > >advantages of an decentralized fuekl production. And you dont 
need a
> > > >chemical workshop to produce your own fuele at home. A ram 
press for
> > > >about 200 $ and some plastc barrel is all you need.
> > >
> > > That is not convincing Reinhard. In the future more diesels will
> > > probably be adapted to SVO use, but that will leave millions of
> > > vehicles all over the world not so adapted, bringing us back to 
the
> > > same choice between making biodiesel and rigging a two-tank 
system
> > > with heating etc to use SVO... on some vehicles, maybe not on 
others,
> > > whereas biodiesel will work in any diesel.
> > >
> > > There is also a shortage of good, long-term studies on the 
effects of
> > > using SVO, unlike with biodiesel, and no long-term studies on 
the use
> > > of WVO that I'm aware of. None of the European manufacturers of 
SVO
> > > systems covers the use of WVO, right?
> > >
> > > Biodiesel also gives you the advantage of decentralised fuel 
production.
> > >
> > > There is no need to have a chemical workshop to produce 
biodiesel at
> > > home. It is simple.
> > >
> > > $200 would more than cover the costs of everything needed to 
make
> > > biodiesel, and no need for a ram press.
> > >
> > > >For the mean time, you can convert your diesel engines into 
plant
> > > >oil engines (the still run on diesel). The conversion kits are 
not
> > > >expensive, but they are a bit different for one engine or the 
other.
> > > >(The Mercedes 123 engine doesn't have to be modified at all. 
You
> > > >just run it with SVO. If its cold, you add some diesel.
> > >
> > > Some kits are better than others. Some kits are not to be 
recommended
> > > at all. Some manufacturers claim their kits are suitable for any
> > > diesel in any climate, using WVO, and this is not true. But 
people
> > > buy these kits anyway, and there are plenty of stories of ruined
> > > pumps. Again, I know of no such stories with biodiesel use.
> > >
> > > And WVO remains a problem. If this valuable waste resource, 
used by
> > > many or most small-scale biodiesel makers, is to be used in 
straight
> > > SVO systems it has to be pre-treated, with not much less 
processing
> > > required than that needed to make biodiesel. And you still 
won't have
> > > the guaranteed results that biodiesel will give you.
> > >
> > > >In Germany, the producer of the tractors for agriculture are 
already
> > > >very interested to offer SVO-versions of their diersel engines 
to
> > > >the farmers (Deutz, John Deere). So in a short future, 
probably the
> > > >truck engine producers will do the same and later the car 
engine
> > > >producers.
> > >
> > > Which still leaves the older motors, especially in the Third 
World.
> > >
> > > >Another important argument for the use of SVO instead of BD is 
the
> > > >energy input for its production. With BD it is about 1/3, i.e. 
you
> > > >need about 30% of the energy of 1 litre of BD to produce 1 
litre of
> > > >BD (in form of Merthanol or aethanol, chemicals,
> > > >destillation/purification).
> > >
> > > That depends very much on how it's done, and in what setting.
> > >
> > > >For the production of SVO you need only about 15 % (12 % for
> > > >agriculture, 3 % for oil extraction). If you use ecological 
advanced
> > > >production methods, you can reduce these 12 % considerably.
> > >
> > > Your second sentence applies to on-farm biodiesel production 
too.
> > >
> > > I have some arguments with Schrimpff's chart as well.
> > >
> > > >Ernst Schrimpff of the Tecnical College of Weihenstephan, 
Germany,
> > > >listed 8 parameters to compare SVO with BD. Here his list 
(partly):
> > > >
> > > >see also the attachment or:
> > > >
> > > >http://jatropha.org/p-o-engines/svo-bd-characteristics.htm
> > > >
> > > > Plant oil (SVO) biodiesel (BD)
> > > >
> > > >1) Physical characteristics:
> > > >
> > > >physical density 0,90 - 0,92 0,88
> > > >
> > > >viscosity 60 - 80 7 - 8
> > > >
> > > >ignition point > 220 135
> > > >
> > > >2) Chemical characteristics:
> > > >
> > > >phosphate mg/kg < 15 < 15
> > > >
> > > >sulphur mg/kg < 10 < 10
> > > >
> > > >Chem. reaction neutral, very low
> > > > hygroscopic, solvent, fast reaction
> > > >
> > > >3) Production:
> > > >
> > > >principle decentralized small
> > > > central, big industrial units
> > >
> > > The biodiesel entry here is wrong - it should read the same as 
for
> > > SVO: decentralized small.
> > >
> > > > oil expellers
> > > >chemical compounds needed -
> > > > methanol, potassium hydroxyd
> > > >
> > > >energy input 12 % 29 %
> > >
> > > Questionable.
> > >
> > > >5) Transport / storage no risk small risk
> > >
> > > In the US, no risk.
> > >
> > > >6) Environment
> > > >
> > > >biol. degradation very fast delayed
> > >
> > > The EPA findings contradict this. You can find this information 
via
> > > the NBB site.
> > >
> > > >danger to water no small
> > >
> > > The EPA findings contradict this too. Biodiesel is used for
> > > remediating oil spills after all. Whereas rapeseed oil can be 
highly
> > > destructive in a water spill.
> > >
> > > >human toxicity regularly no toxic
> > > > (or small)
> > >
> > > Not so - biodiesel is non-toxic, again according to the EPA.
> > >
> > > >material circuit complete
> > > > difficult to realize
> > > >
> > > >7) Social acceptability
> > > >
> > > >strategy small, decentralized big, central
> > >
> > > Wrong: read "small, decentralized" for biodiesel.
> > >
> > > >logistics simple komplex
> > >
> > > Not so - the many thousands of people with no technical or 
chemistry
> > > qualifications all over the world who're successfully making 
their
> > > own biodiesel testify to that. And I reject the argument that 
they
> > > cannot make a quality product - they do make a quality product.
> > >
> > > >transportation short distances long distances
> > >
> > > Not so: read "short distances" for biodiesel. Should really be 
short
> > > or zero distance for both.
> > >
> > > >vulnerability small higher
> > >
> > > Based on what?
> > >
> > > >regional income high low
> > > >generation
> > >
> > > Not so - biodiesel is an excellent candidate for micro-regional
> > > production efforts, with great local benefits.
> > >
> > > >8) Costs
> > > >
> > > >fuel production 0,25 - 0,40
> > > > 0,45 - 0,60 US$
> > > >
> > > >fuel prices 0,45 - 0,55
> > > > 0,70 - 0,85 US$
> > >
> > > Neither of these apply to small-scale local brewers.
> > >
> > > This is perhaps a more useful (and simpler) chart than 
Schrimpff's:
> > >
> > > Needs processing
> > > Biodiesel Yes
> > > SVO/WVO Less
> > >
> > > Guaranteed trouble-free
> > > Biodiesel Yes
> > > SVO/WVO No
> > >
> > > Engine conversion
> > > Biodiesel No
> > > SVO/WVO Yes
> > >
> > > Cheaper
> > > Biodiesel  Sometimes
> > > SVO/WVO Usually
> > >
> > > I've had this argument here before. I'll probably be accused of
> > > favouring biodiesel over SVO. In fact I favour neither, or 
rather
> > > both. As I said at the start, it depends on the circumstances 
and
> > > individual preferences.
> > >
> > > There are two pages at Journey to Forever where this choice is
> > > discussed - here:
> > > Three choices
> > > 1. Mixing it
> > > 2. Straight vegetable oil
> > > 3. Biodiesel
> > > http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_make.html#3choices
> > >
> > > ... and, in somewhat more detail, here, at the page you reffed 
below
> > > (thanks!):
> > > http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_svo.html
> > > Straight vegetable oil as diesel fuel:
> > > Guide to using vegetable oil as diesel fuel
> > > SVO systems
> > > References
> > > SVO vs biodiesel in Europe
> > > European SVO resources
> > > Diesel information
> > > Fats and oils
> > >
> > > I rather agree that SVO will probably be the fuel of the 
future, but
> > > I see that future as more distant than most SVO proponents tend 
to
> > > see it. I would say that SVO use is still at an experimental 
stage
> > > and needs quite a lot of further development. Most of all it 
needs
> > > long-term tests of various kinds, and, since some motors are 
more
> > > suitable than others (which is not the case with biodiesel), it 
needs
> > > quite a lot of different tests.
> > >
> > > So I'm very much in favour of SVO, but I think it's an 
exaggeration
> > > to pretend that it's a mature, assured technology, as many do.
> > >
> > > In fact I really reject this whole argument about biodiesel vs 
SVO.
> > > It's a choice, an informed decision to make, but there should 
not be
> > > any opposition, the two are complementary. There's a lot of
> > > unjustified biodiesel-bashing by the SVO camp in Europe 
especially,
> > > and I think it's ridiculous - it's ridiculous that there are 
two such
> > > camps. Perhaps it's because biodiesel is more industrialised 
there,
> > > as is also happening in the US - but that does NOT exclude small
> > > producers and home-producers.
> > >
> > > Biodiesel and SVO are in the SAME camp, please - it's the 
fossil-fuel
> > > interests that are in the opposite camp. Good heavens.
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > >
> > > Keith Addison
> > > Journey to Forever
> > > Handmade Projects
> > > Osaka, Japan
> > > http://journeytoforever.org/
> > >
> > >
> > > >Interesting links to this SVO - DB - discussion are:
> > > >
> > > >http://www.vegburner.co.uk
> > > >
> > > >http://www.pflanzenoel-motor.de  (German)
> > > >
> > > >http://jatropha.org/p-o-engines/conversion-cars.htm
> > > >
> > > >http://elsbett.com/emotanfr.htm
> > > >
> > > >http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_svo.html
> > > >
> > > >Kind regards
> > > >
> > > >Reinhard Henning
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >bagani GbR, Reinhard Henning, Rothkreuz 11, D-88138 
Weissensberg,
> Germany
> > > >Tel: ++49 8389 984129, Fax: 984128, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >internet: www.bagani.de
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> > >
> > > Biofuels list archives:
> > > http://archive.nnytech.net/
> > >
> > > Please do NOT send &quot;unsubscribe&quot; messages to the list 
address.
> > > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> > >
> > > Biofuels list archives:
> > > http://archive.nnytech.net/
> > >
> > > Please do NOT send &quot;unsubscribe&quot; messages to the list 
address.
> > > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > bagani GbR, Reinhard Henning, Rothkreuz 11, D-88138 Weissensberg, 
Germany
> > Tel: ++49 8389 984129, Fax: 984128, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > internet: www.bagani.de
> >
> >
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> >
> > Biofuels list archives:
> > http://archive.nnytech.net/
> >
> > Please do NOT send &quot;unsubscribe&quot; messages to the list 
address.
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Save on REALTOR Fees
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Xw80LD/h1ZEAA/Ey.GAA/FGYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send &quot;unsubscribe&quot; messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to