Fred Finch wrote:

>Clif, 
>
>No flames from me just...
>
><snip>
>
>  
>
>>Where is the outrage at the coverage of the war in Iraq ?
>>    
>>
>
>Coverage is adequate and the news is not very good.
>  
>
http://chrenkoff.blogspot.com/2005/07/good-news-from-iraq-part-31.html
http://unix.dfn.org/good_news_iraq.shtml
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/opinion/baroneweb/mb_030726.htm
http://www.command-post.org/2_archives/019738.html
http://tampatrib.com/opinion/MGBQKJP0MCE.html
(A very thoughtful look at the reasons behind the current coverage.)

>  
>
>>Have you heard one positive story on NPR or anywhere else ?
>>    
>>
>
>When there is no good news what is the use of making a fake report?
>  
>
Please see above.

>  
>
>>Where is the outrage at the fine work Michael Moore and numerous others
>>are doing at peddling lies ?
>>    
>>
>
>Lies or opinions?  It seems that Pat roberston can have them but not
>Michael Moore?  Cite Links to the lies and we'll talk...
>  
>
http://www.bowlingfortruth.com/
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5335853/site/newsweek/
http://www.factcheck.org/article131.html
http://slate.msn.com/id/2102723/

>  
>
>>Where is the outrage when fine mothers, sisters, sons and fathers who
>>are proud of the service their sons and daughters are offering in the
>>Armed Services are not given any voice and one heartbroken mother is
>>given weeks of press coverage because she is against the war in Irag ?
>>    
>>
>
>It seems that President Bush and Faux Nooze  is giving them voice, but
>who is listening?
>  
>
Good point. But then again public opinion is usually shaped by what they 
are told in the most strident tone and by the most numerous and loudest 
voices.

>  
>
>>And finally a point that may need some attention by the "Men of God"
>>judicatory committee on this list :
>>Where is the outrage at allowing Muslim clerics right here in America to
>>daily call for the UTTER destruction of not only Americans who believe
>>that Allah may not be the way, but also any other infidels?
>>    
>>
>
>Again, cite a link and we'll talk.  
>
>For every link you bring, I will find 10 Muslim cleric statements
>denouncing those statements and the war and the 9/11 attacks.
>  
>
http://www.leaderu.com/focus/islamandjihad.html
(I cannot speak or write as eloquently as this summary.)

>  
>
>>All I'm saying is that I for one  feel compelled to be very conscious of
>>my own "blind spots" as I am chief among those who can stand only by
>>grace .....
>>    
>>
>
>Yet you make it point to attempt to point out the "blind spots" of others.  
>
>A suggestion perhaps, work on your own "blind spots."  
>
>IMO, Peace is not a blind spot.  
>
>fred
>  
>
I agree. I was too harsh in my statements. I apologize for the tone of 
them. Please forgive me. It seems the log in my eye was blinding me and 
needs some attention before I work on the perceived speck in others.
I too feel peace is a very good thing however perhaps we should be 
considering "what kind of peace" we are talking about.

A fellow seeker of the truth,
Clif

>
>  
>
>>Just a thought to further take this list into a land far away from
>>renewable energy sources.
>>
>>In need of clarity,
>>Clif
>>
>>TarynToo wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Amen Robert!
>>>
>>>While not a christian, I've read many of the major scriptures of the
>>>world. While reading the Robertson thread, I was thinking how badly we
>>>needed to hear the "Who would Jesus hate? Who would Jesus kill?"
>>>message.
>>>
>>>Your message is so on target. The most important teaching we receive,
>>>not just from Jesus, but from almost all prophets is "Deeds are greater
>>>than words. Love the least, as you love the great. Power demands
>>>responsibility." If we are to follow their teachings, we must not tend
>>>the church, we must tend our hearts and minds, and the whole world.
>>>
>>>All it takes to distinguish the truly good from the hypocrite, is to
>>>attend to their actions more than their words. How sad that so many of
>>>us are deceived by the transparent and self-serving lies of our
>>>political, spiritual, and commercial masters.
>>>
>>>We are slaves, the truth will set us free.
>>>Thank you, Taryn
>>>ornae.com
>>>
>>>
>>>On Aug 26, 2005, at 11:13 AM, robert luis rabello wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>BT wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Greetings fellow revolutionary alchemists!
>>>>>
>>>>>The question I have is, How do we help separate the good-hearted
>>>>>followers from their devious leaders?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>     I've found the best thing to do is go back to the scriptures from
>>>>whence Christians are supposed to derive standards for their behavior.
>>>> This is especially true when the argument of "you shouldn't judge
>>>>anyone" comes to fore.  Now, Jesus himself said this, in the second
>>>>part of Luke 12: 48:
>>>>
>>>>     "From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>from one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked."
>>>      
>>>
>>>>     Leaders, who ought to know better, are far more accountable than the
>>>>average person.  When Jesus confronted the leaders of his day, he
>>>>seldom had pleasant words for them for this very reason.  Here is an
>>>>example:
>>>>
>>>>     "Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and
>>>>its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit.
>>>>(There's a biofuel angle in there!)  You brood of vipers!  How can you
>>>>who are evil say anything good?  For out of the overflow of the heart
>>>>the mouth speaks.  The good man brings good things out of the good
>>>>stored up in him, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil
>>>>stored up in him.  But I tell you that men will have to give account
>>>>on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken.  For
>>>>by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be
>>>>condemned."  (Matthew 12: 33 - 37)
>>>>
>>>>     So, no higher authority than Jesus Christ himself condemns reckless
>>>>rhetoric, and we who call ourselves Christians should not soft pedal
>>>>this kind of behavior either.  A man like Pat Robertson, who CLAIMS to
>>>>be a Christian, should have read statements of this nature and taken
>>>>them to heart long ago.  When I complain about this kind of problem, I
>>>>do so because it degrades the standing of the Christian faith in the
>>>>eyes of nonbelievers who are watching.  If I, a nobody, get upset when
>>>>the name of God is blasphemed in this manner, shouldn't genuine
>>>>Christian leaders roundly condemn the same behavior?  After all, this
>>>>is what the scriptures admonish:
>>>>
>>>>     "Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you
>>>>of wrongdoing, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day
>>>>he visits us."  (1 Peter 2: 12)
>>>>
>>>>     And elsewhere:
>>>>
>>>>     "But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there
>>>>WILL BE FALSE TEACHERS AMONG YOU.  (Emphasis is mine.)  They will
>>>>secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Sovereign
>>>>Lord who bought them--bringing swift destruction on themselves.  Many
>>>>will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into
>>>>disrepute.  In their greed, these teachers will exploit you with
>>>>stories they have made up . . ."  (2 Peter 2: 1 - 3)
>>>>
>>>>     The fact that Pat Robertson calls himself a Christian disgusts me for
>>>>this very reason.  He's not following the example of Jesus Christ, so
>>>>by his actions, he denies Christ.  If he's impulsive and can't control
>>>>himself, he has no power from God.  A person who calls himself a
>>>>Christian is one who should know God very well.  Therefore:
>>>>
>>>>     "We know that we have come to know him if we obey his commands.  The
>>>>man who says, 'I know him', but does not do what he commands is a liar
>>>>and the truth is not in him.  But if anyone obeys his word, God's love
>>>>is truly made complete in him.  This is how we know we are in him:
>>>>Whoever claims to live in him must walk as Jesus did."  (1 John 2: 3 -
>>>>6)
>>>>
>>>>     So then, if we examine what Jesus did, we will find a man who never
>>>>sought harm for anyone else.  He was a man who lived by high principle
>>>>and spoke very carefully.  He did not advocate violence, he did not
>>>>stir up a mob to overthrow the Romans, he did not seek political power
>>>>or financial gain.  Therefore, if you see someone who claims to be a
>>>>Christian doing these things, you can KNOW that he's a liar.  Further
>>>>on, you can read this:
>>>>
>>>>     "Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no
>>>>murderer has eternal life in him."  (1 John 3: 15)
>>>>
>>>>     Now, I know that these faux Christians will say "Those verses only
>>>>apply to your Christian brother," because that's what they're
>>>>programmed to say by the false teachers they follow.  But the
>>>>principles that Christians should follow transcend this worldly
>>>>attitude.  Once again, here's what Jesus actually taught:
>>>>
>>>>     "You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your
>>>>enemy.  But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who
>>>>persecute you that you may be sons of your Father in heaven.  He
>>>>causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the
>>>>righteous and the unrighteous.  If you love those who love you, what
>>>>reward will you get?  Are not even the tax collectors doing that?  And
>>>>if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others?
>>>> Do not even the pagans do that?  Be perfect, therefore, as your
>>>>heavenly Father is perfect."  (Matthew 5: 43 - 48)
>>>>
>>>>     The principle outlined above is one of social justice.  Anyone who
>>>>calls himself a Christian can be characterized as one by considering
>>>>how he treats his enemies and others who do not love him.  Pat
>>>>Robertson seeks political power.  Pat Robertson called for a team of
>>>>"specialists" to take out Chavez.  Pat Robertson does not behave in
>>>>harmony with the principle outlined in the above passage.  I dare say
>>>>that had there been no hue and cry over the reckless call for killing,
>>>>Pat Robertson would NOT have apologized for his remarks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>robert luis rabello
>>>>...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Biofuel mailing list
>>>Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>>>http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
>>>
>>>Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>>>http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>>>
>>>Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
>>>http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Biofuel mailing list
>>Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>>http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
>>
>>Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>>http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>>
>>Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Biofuel mailing list
>Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
>
>Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>
>Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
>http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
>
>
>  
>


_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to