> > I would like to do a poll: > > 1) Should these textual conventions be accepted as they are? Yes. > > 2) Would this WG like to see us define a normative set or a > non-normative set of facilities and severities? Non-normative. > > 3) Whether normative or non-normative, which is more important? > efficient allocation of the limited facility values, or backwards > compatibility with existing (and historic) implementations?
Backwards compatibility. This is very important. > Glenn _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
