On Mon, 24.03.14 17:25, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2014-03-24 17:21 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>:
> > Well, but we are a lot more dependent on correct headers than other
> > parsers anyway... For example, the LSB deps have traditionally been much
> > less accurately followed than they are now...
> >
> > I mean, we don't claim compatibility with scripts with broken headers,
> > anyway...
>
> Sorry, but I don't get your point.
>
> If I disable chkconfig support, then I don't want the chkconfig
> headers parsed. Isn't that quite obvious?
Well, it's two different things:
a) defer to /sbin/chkconfig if "systemctl enable" is used on a sysv
service.
b) take into account any information included in the sysv header that
exists.
Turning off chkconfig support does a), not b). And I'd really prefer if
sysv scripts would behave the same way on all systemd installations... I
mean that's what we try to do after all, provide a unified interface
for developers...
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
