2014-03-25 0:14 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: > On Mon, 24.03.14 23:59, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: >> I think the priority information is irrelevant in this particular >> issue. It's the discrepancy regarding runlevel information. >> >> So I doubt your patch makes a difference, but I'll double check. > > I am tempted to also drop the runlevel parsing from the LSB and > chkconfig headers. After all they are mostly irrelevant since what is > linked in /etc/rc?.d/ is what matters, and not the stuff in the init > script themselves. > > Let me now if this would make things work then for you. If so, I'll drop > this too then.
I think this might work, without having actually tested it. That said, if you drop runlevel and priority parsing from the chkconfig header, is there anything useful left in # chkconfig: ? Regarding # pidfile:, it's basically the same problem, ie. the mere existence (on Debian) doesn't necessarily mean it is correct. The result could be, that we mark a service as Type=forking pointing it at the wrong pid file, leading to the service not being tracked properly. I'd have to check all packages affected by this [0], to see if the information in there is actually correct. [0] http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=%23+pidfile%3A -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel