В Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:41:04 +0200 Werner Fink <wer...@suse.de> пишет:
> From: arvidj...@gmail.com > > will terminate emergency.service due to implicit dependencies on basic.target > and therefore sysinit.target which in turn conflict with emergency.target. > I always considered it as a stopgap not suitable for upstream. But I still do not know what can be done to fix it. It still looks rather wrong that any arbitrary service can displace the whole run-level. May be we need counterpart for RefuseManualStart so that some targets can only be displaced manually, not as result of implicit dependency. > --- > units/emergency.service.in | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git units/emergency.service.in units/emergency.service.in > index 94c090f..59f7cda 100644 > --- units/emergency.service.in > +++ units/emergency.service.in > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ > Description=Emergency Shell > Documentation=man:sulogin(8) > DefaultDependencies=no > -Conflicts=shutdown.target > +Conflicts=shutdown.target syslog.socket > Before=shutdown.target > > [Service] _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel