В Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:38:27 +0200
Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> пишет:
> On Fri, 13.06.14 16:41, Werner Fink (wer...@suse.de) wrote:
>
> > From: arvidj...@gmail.com
> >
> > will terminate emergency.service due to implicit dependencies on
> > basic.target
> > and therefore sysinit.target which in turn conflict with
> > emergency.target.
>
> I am not entirely sure how emergecny.service should have been reached
> with syslog.socket in place? isolate should not have left it around?
>
commit 80cfe9e163b1c92f917e0a5e053b148fca790677
Author: Dr. Tilmann Bubeck <t.bub...@reinform.de>
Date: Fri May 4 10:32:47 2012 +0200
Do no isolate in case of emergency or severe problems
> >
> > ---
> > units/emergency.service.in | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git units/emergency.service.in units/emergency.service.in
> > index 94c090f..59f7cda 100644
> > --- units/emergency.service.in
> > +++ units/emergency.service.in
> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> > Description=Emergency Shell
> > Documentation=man:sulogin(8)
> > DefaultDependencies=no
> > -Conflicts=shutdown.target
> > +Conflicts=shutdown.target syslog.socket
> > Before=shutdown.target
> >
> > [Service]
>
>
> Lennart
>
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
