On Fri, 05.08.16 12:33, Dr. Werner Fink (wer...@suse.de) wrote: > > Yeah, to make this clear: I do not blame libvirt for this borkedness > > at all. I blame the kernel. > > Hmmm ... IMHO it is useless to pass the buck from kernel to user space > as well do the same from user space back to kernel. I've an open bug > from a customer and this bug requires a solution. AFAICS libvirt can > not do this but machined could do.
machined certainly can't. It doesn't do cgroup stuff at all. It just keeps tracks of local containers and VMs. cgroup management is done by systemd in PID1 itself. So no, machined certainly can't. And in systemd itself we are very conservative on working around broken kernel behaviour. Note that Tejun (the kernel's cgroup maintainer) actually acknowledges that cpuset has broken semantics there. For many cases CPUAffinity= is actually enough, not for all, if you need a quick solution. If you require the correct solution, please work with Tejun to fix the cpuset semantics and as that has happened we can start making use of this in systemd. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
