BTW, Ed. I'm sorry, but I don't think it is important at all to be an Olympic tourist. The fact that we send so many Olympic tourists is part of the reason why we haven't had an Olympic medalist in any event longer than 800 m since the rump Olympics of '84.
edndana wrote:
Just a clarification - meant to say that being an Olympic tourist is more important than winning points in a conference meet (or even the NCAA meet in my opinion).
- Ed
----- Original Message ----- From: "edndana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ""Athletics"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Sandrock: 'Ritz' aims for Olympic 'A' standard
mentalityWayne -
I think you're both right and wrong. I think that there is a
of chasing NCAA qualifying times that has done serious damage to bothmany
competitive attitudes and programs themselves. This has been discussed
Atimes before.
But if I was Ritz and his coach, I would absolutely go to Stanford.
This is not an NCAA "B" qualifer we are talking about, this is the Olympic
standard. This is a situation where in the biggest meets of the year,NCAA
and Olympic Trials, he wants to be able to race rather than worry abouthis
time. In Sacramento - despite the amazing luck of cool weather in 2000 -who
the truth is that conditions on July evenings are usually abysmal for
distance running. If we have even normal Sacramento conditions, no one
can't break 27:20 on a good day will have a shot at an A standard. Ican't
even begin to describe how badly conditions have affected some workoutsI've
shoulddone at 8PM in the summer here.
And yes, being an Olympic tourist is ABSOLUTELY more important than
winning points for your team in a dual meet. I know very few people who
would disagree - obviously you are one. If you're saying that no one
thego to the Olympics unless they have a chance of getting top five, well you're entitled to your opinion.
To me - and I know I'll get creamed by the college coaches for this -
the real crime is that most talented young distance runners have to make
sacrifice of NOT going to the most competitive 10K in the country (savethe
trials) and instead doubling or tripling 3 or 4 times and sacrificingtheir
training for it. It's the fact that kids get hardly a break fromSeptember
Alto,to late June. That most cannot hone their skills in Europe or even other summer meets at ages 20,21 and 22 because their college season, full of meets below their abilities (unless they attend one of less than ten top schools), takes priority.
Decry the loss of competitive college meets if you will. From a fan standpoint it makes sense. But in today's global reality, NCAA distance competition won't prepare you to break 27:00 or 13:00. We are fortunate that Colorado realizes this and is properly nurturing the brightest young talent since Bob Kennedy.
- Ed Parrot
----- Original Message ----- From: "Wayne T. Armbrust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tandf listserv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Sandrock: 'Ritz' aims for Olympic 'A' standard
to run 10,000 meters against Big 12 competition in what would likely be noIt's hard to believe that an athletic administrator would support something like this, or that a head coach would want his athlete to do this. I guess Wetmore doesn't really want to have a track team, just a few good (by U.S. standard) distance runners. Does Wetmore think that Ritz can't get a standard except in the idealized environment of a race at Stanford? He is either a great runner or he isn't. Great runners don't have any problem getting standards. People who have a problem getting a standard aren't going to do well in the competition in question. Is being an Olympic tourist more important than winning points for your team in the Conference meet? This is the kind of mentality that is killing collegiate track.
magpie wrote:
Instead of stepping on the starting line in Norman, Okla., Friday night
more than a hard workout, CU junior Dathan Ritzenhein will be in Palo
Calif., to run 10K against the best Americans in a race that should be asbest
competitive as this summer's Olympic trials.
coach Mark Wetmore's boss â "Ritz" is getting the chance to go for theWith the backing of associate athletic director Chris May â head track
Olympic "A" standard of 27:49 at the Cardinal Invitational, one of the
meets for distance runners in the country. It will be Ritzenhein's firstevent
track 10,000 meters ever and will give he and Wetmore a feel for what
Ritzenhein should run at the Olympic trials in July."There
"I feel ready and am excited to do my first one," Ritzenhein said.
should be some good post-collegiate guys in there."Meb
Indeed there will be. Start with American 10,000 meter record holder
Keflezighi, who is expected to follow pacers in an attempt to break hisown
record. Bob Kennedy, the U.S. record holder for 5,000 meters will also befans.
there, as well as Dan Browne, Abdi Abdirahim, Weldon Johnson and Brad
Hauser. Boulder's Justin Young is also in the field and could surprise
http://www.dailycamera.com/bdc/running/article/0,1713,BDC_2413_2846220,00.htmlFull article:
of5,000 this year.
Buff men, women set for Big 12 meet
CU's Metivier should be favored in 2 events
http://mas.scripps.com/BDC/2004/04/29/0429meti_e.jpg
CU's Renee Metivier has one of the nation's top collegiate marks in the
By Michael Sandrock, For the Camera April 29, 2004
Renee Metivier has just one complaint about her time at the University
Colorado _ she wishes she had started here a couple of years ago.http://www.dailycamera.com/bdc/cu_track_field/article/0,1713,BDC_2458_2846219,00.html
transferring from Georgia Tech and joining the cross country team lastAs it is, Metivier has made a big mark in a short time at CU. Since
August, Metivier has progressed to the point where she is one of the
favorites in the Big 12 Track and Field Championships that start today at
the University of Oklahoma's John Jacobs Field.
Full article:
===========
"I like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past." Patrick Henry
_____________________________________________________________ Sign up for a 6mb FREE email from http://www.spl.at Join the buzz, chat with us! http://chat.spl.at
-- Wayne T. Armbrust, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computomarx (TM) 3604 Grant Ct. Columbia MO 65203-5800 USA (573) 445-6675 (voice & FAX) http://www.Computomarx.com "Know the difference between right and wrong... Always give your best effort... Treat others the way you'd like to be treated..." - Coach Bill Sudeck (1926-2000)
-- Wayne T. Armbrust, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computomarx (TM) 3604 Grant Ct. Columbia MO 65203-5800 USA (573) 445-6675 (voice & FAX) http://www.Computomarx.com "Know the difference between right and wrong... Always give your best effort... Treat others the way you'd like to be treated..." - Coach Bill Sudeck (1926-2000)