On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Alex Mauer <ha...@hawkesnest.net> wrote:
> highway=path+access=no+bicycle=designated for the former and > highway=path+bicycle=yes for the latter. > Each to their own, but I'd prefer: highway=cycleway+designation=official_cycleway (or whatever) (for those officially signposted) and highway=cycleway (for those that are not officially signposted but are otherwise "just as good") You don't really need the access=no (or foot=no) for the former; it's distinctly rare that there's no route for pedestrians alongside. Using bicycle=designated does not give the precision required (sorry Alex, I know it's your pet scheme, but I don't think it works). Ekkehart - other than the obvious pain of adding another tag to the legions of official cycleways in Germany, is there any real problem with this approach? Richard
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
