On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The simplest is probably to call the fourth >> a trunk with a note that there's a case for it being a trunk_link, but >> that trunk is more renderer-proof. > > That seems incorrect, and hence tagging (incorrectly) for the > renderer. Whether something is a link should not depend on how links > are rendered. >
Call them two-way links, if you prefer. I may get round to filing a trac ticket to request they are rendered better in Mapnik. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
