Norbert Wenzel <norbert.wenzel.lists@...> writes: > > > On 2013-07-18 13:24, Stefan Tauner wrote: > > > > Das alte TU-Gebäude ist auch durchaus *ähem* "interessant" in Hinblick > > auf footways... > > http://osm.org/go/0JrIcECyg-- > > Ach du Sch.... Sollte man beim Indoor Mapping nicht highway=corridor > verwenden? So ist das tatsächlich nur Müll. Das kann kein Mensch mehr > routen, nichtmal wenn man sich auskennt. Und wie's ausschaut brauch ich > eh net kommentieren, oder?
Hello all, I am one of the students who worked on the TU building data for the class project. We were informed of the discussion here regarding the data we uploaded to OSM server. I apologize for any problems that our submission caused. We are willing to fix the now "ruined" model if someone would take time to explain in English what the problems are exactly (my German is not that good, and google translate of the thread gives only a rough idea what the issue is here). If I understand correctly, the main issue is our usage of highway=footway for indoor circulation network, and the fix for this would be using the highway=corridor in all the indoor spaces? Did I understand this correctly? Are there any references that we missed with recommendations which tags should and shouldn't be used (especially for indoors). Are there any other obvious problems with our submission? any feedback is welcome... regards, Milos _______________________________________________ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at