On 8 April 2011 09:28, Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com> wrote: > If the data owner doesn't grant permission under an acceptable licence > then we shouldn't relying on one interpretation of very recent > Australian case. Especially since there are other areas of law that > may come into play here.
Actually the court case was a few years ago I think, this was an appeal against the earlier ruling. > Keeping OSM data clean is the priority. It's a pity those pushing for the current license change aren't so adamant, it seems to me they haven't put enough effort into informing people about the full ramifications of the CTs. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
