On 8 April 2011 14:23, Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you are talking about Sensis, than that is still a Federal Court > judgement, which I believe Sensis are seeking leave to appeal to the > High Court, and the results will be very interesting to see. I hope > the High Court takes the opportunity to clarify what it meant in > IceTV.
There has already been an appeal over the Sensis decision and the original ruling against Telstra was upheld, there may be further appeals but from what I understand the issue is pretty much settled. > Again with respect, what you regard as "pretty straight forward", is > about to be litigated by some of the highest paid lawyers in the > country, in front of the highest court in Australia. Do you think > they would be spending that time and money if they thought that it was > a straightforward area of settled law? Please list sources for this comment, because as far as I understand it there is no further appeals on the matter currently pending. In any case I noticed you completely skipped the next part of my comment, OSM-F is heading directly into very tainted data due to the debarcle that is the current license change, so unless and until OSM-F decides to do things properly any minor amount of data is the least of their problems. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au