On 8 July 2011 14:06, SteveC <st...@asklater.com> wrote: > Actually, the license process has been known about for a long, long time so > it's not this new turnaround you cast it as. In addition, everyone else > (bing, ordnance survey...) has worked with us very reasonably. In fact it's > hard to say near map have been unreasonable, just that they were not quite as > happy as all our other contributors of similar data.
Was the OS given all pertinent facts about ODBL and how it doesn't require a minimum level of attribution on produced works? AFAIK OS requires attribution and ODBL doesn't require it down stream. This is a big show stopped for most government agencies I've heard about in Australia. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
