Forgive me if this has already been asked, and I believe Ewen may have been
alluding to this.

How is address going to be 'placed' onto the map, I assume a node?

My primary question is where is the node going to be placed?

Will it be placed in the centre of the property/parcel? If so, they will be
fine in denser areas but how effective will they be in rural areas, will
they need to be moved to near the driveway/gate manually? or is this a
non-issue?

In the case of a subdivision where there is common property, will the
common property receive its own address, as on VicPlan it shows a separate
address for both the common property and the units? (see example)

Thanks, Ben.

[image: image.png] (37.88839°S, 145.26755°E)

On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:31, Phil Wyatt <p...@wyatt-family.com> wrote:

> Go for it Andrew,
>
>
>
> I am all for better data, so even small steps are better than missing data.
>
>
>
> Re Data consumers - I tend to work with volunteer groups that often have a
> low level of GIS knowledge so 'complete exports' of data will always be
> best for them. It gets them started on mapping projects (QGIS) and also
> gets them into OpenStreetMap!
>
>
>
> Cheers - Phil
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ewen Hill <ewen.h...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 8 June 2021 7:34 PM
> *To:* o...@97k.com
> *Cc:* OpenStreetMap <talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Victorian Vicmap Address Import Proposal
>
>
>
> Andrew,
>
>   Thank you for both your initial work and the communication as well as
> the listening. Can I congratulate you on the lib/toOSM.js for the
> capitalisation and duplication processing. Very detailed
>
>
>
> A few numpty questions after being late to the party...
>
>    - Is there a node id on the vicmap address and are we storing this in
>    OSM so we can match and look for missing or deleted ones later?
>    - Can we provide a couple of samples of
>    the existingAddressesWithNewTagsOnly export once available
>    - Could we perform some sampling of suburbs/levels. Perhaps
>
>
>    - Mallacoota (large reserves, complex islands and altered crown/public
>       land ownership)
>       - Meringur or Learmouth (large farming community)
>       - Fitzroy (complex inner city)
>
>
>    - I can't see what happens on collision with a totally incorrect
>    address. Is the new node just added where you can't find a matching
>    address.
>
>
>    - Is there an exceptions file for the above that can be reviewed.
>       Could map roulette some of these?
>
>
>    - How have you gone with best practices globally?
>
> I am amazed by the amount of code you have developed and documented to do
> this. The benefits of adding this import will far outweigh any minor local
> issues. Chapeau!
>
>
>
> Ewen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 16:19, cleary <o...@97k.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Andrew. A considered and thoughtful response. I support your
> proposed actions. Your work for OSM is always very good and much
> appreciated.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2021, at 2:59 PM, Andrew Harvey via Talk-au wrote:
> > To sum up the contentious issue of suburb, postcode, state tags,
> >
> > - Phil, Daniel and Seb would prefer the suburb and postcode on each
> > address object.
> > - Andrew Davidson and cleary would prefer we not include suburb and
> > postcode on each address object and instead require data consumers to
> > derive this data from the existing boundaries, and actively discourage
> > mappers manually adding this data via removing the preset in ID.
> >
> > Thinking further I'd support including the full address details on each
> > address object, to provide a complete address, even if duplicated by
> > the boundary. QA tools could be built to validate these match the admin
> > boundaries and it becomes a maintenance task to maintain these tags,
> > but I think that's okay.
> >
> > However, to avoid stalling this import on this issue (it doesn't sound
> > like anyone will change their mind soon), I'll plan the minimum viable
> > option of excluding addr:suburb, addr:postcode and addr:state from the
> > import.
> >
> > There's nothing stopping a further discussion of a planned automated
> > edit to update address objects with suburb, postcode and state if the
> > community changes their mind later on.
> >
> > I'll make these changes to the import code, then once I've completed
> > all the documentation and remaining issues hopefully post some import
> > candidate files if anyone would like to review.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-au mailing list
> > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Warm Regards
>
> Ewen Hill
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to