It's only occurring again because he's been told that changing roads to DataSA classifications will result in further blocks.
And yeah, as Daniel has said, this is a pointless edit that offers no real improvements, and realistically seems like an attempt for one mapper to continue mapping the way they want to, as per previous efforts. The data exists elsewhere in a very usable format, so it's not as if it's helping to put together some kind of dataset that doesn't yet exist, and I don't see it being used by any current or future data consumer outside of some kind of academic/research oriented output (which I would expect would take DataSA's dataset over us). Thanks, Andrew Welch m...@andrewwelch.net On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 at 18:52, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.ocon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sigh, here we go again. > > Can't be stuffed registering to add comments on that thread. > > This proposal goes against the "map what's on the ground" principles that > countless others have surveyed or made good faith judgement calls on. > > I am unclear why we are still attempting to have any conversation about > this: previous efforts to map in the style proposed were to the point we > considered it nearly vandalism. > This only slightly changes the approach. I have no faith this materially > improves the map. > > I don't want to be out on a bike ride and find misclassified tracks > cutting across private property from armchair mapping. I don't want to go > for a drive and end up routed down things that aren't residential streets > because a ghost record of a road that was never built is marked as > residential in a rural council's data set. > > And most specifically for this dataset, I don't want trucks going down > what is at most a highway tertiary but is officially a highway secondary or > similar based on someone who *isn't in the government* trying to push a > government dataset as gospel, ignoring mapping efforts that have preceded > it. > > > > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, 6:05 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Please have a look at >> https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edit-proposal-south-australias-arterial-traffic-network/110006/2 >> & comment if you wish. >> >> NB I am only posting this to get the word out, the proposal has nothing >> at all to do with me! >> >> Thanks >> >> Graeme >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
