wannes wrote: > 2009/12/2 Ben Laenen <benlae...@gmail.com>: > > Now, should those abandoned tracks be mapped? Sure, why not? > > railway=abandoned is just a tag made for it, implying that it isn't there > > anymore. And it's just fun to see their influence in today's street and > > housing patterns. But it probably doesn't make much sense to render them > > on normal maps. The Mapnik rendering has been changed already a few times > > between showing them and not showing them. > > But it shouldn't be a priority. > Or are we also going to map the Roman Heirbanen? :-)
Sure, already proposed: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/roman_road :-D But of course these features aren't a priority, these tags are only there for when someone doesn't know what to do and the weather is too bad to go outside to map :-) Ben _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
